public-iri@w3.org from March 2012 by date

Friday, 30 March 2012

• [iri] #123: coordinate URI/IRI scheme prefix discussion with W3C HTML WG iri issue tracker
• Re: Duplicate presentations Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: Duplicate presentations Peter Saint-Andre
• Duplicate presentations (was: Re: IRI slides for IETF 83) Martin J. Dürst
• [iri] #122: Fix Ted Hardie's address iri issue tracker

Thursday, 29 March 2012

• IRI slides for IETF 83 Peter Saint-Andre
• updated agenda Peter Saint-Andre
• Meetecho support for IRI WG meeting session Meetecho IETF support
• Re: IETF 83 IRI Agenda and Presentations Chris Weber
• RE: [iri] #121: BIDI: Some users are requiring right-to-left label ordering. Shawn Steele
• Re: [iri] #121: BIDI: Some users are requiring right-to-left label ordering. iri issue tracker
• RE: [iri] #121: BIDI: Some users are requiring right-to-left label ordering. Shawn Steele
• Re: [iri] #121: BIDI: Some users are requiring right-to-left label ordering. Slim Amamou
• RE: [iri] #121: BIDI: Some users are requiring right-to-left label ordering. Shawn Steele
• Re: [iri] #121: BIDI: Some users are requiring right-to-left label ordering. Slim Amamou
• RE: [iri] #121: BIDI: Some users are requiring right-to-left label ordering. Shawn Steele
• Re: [iri] #22: Fix "IRIs as identity tokens MUST" iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #121: BIDI: Some users are requiring right-to-left label ordering. iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #121: BIDI: Some users are requiring right-to-left label ordering. iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #121: BIDI: Some users are requiring right-to-left label ordering. iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #25: Adapt rules for bidi components to those in IDNA2008 (RFC 5893) (was: Adapt rules for bidi components to those in IDNAbis) iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #28: allow numbers at end of bidi components? iri issue tracker

Wednesday, 28 March 2012

• RE: [iri] #121: BIDI: Some users are requiring right-to-left label ordering. Shawn Steele
• RE: [iri] #121: BIDI: Some users are requiring right-to-left label ordering. Larry Masinter
• Re: [iri] #121: BIDI: Some users are requiring right-to-left label ordering. iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #121: BIDI: Some users are requiring right-to-left label ordering. iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #121: BIDI: Some users are requiring right-to-left label ordering. iri issue tracker

Tuesday, 27 March 2012

• slides, please! Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: IETF 83 IRI Agenda and Presentations Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: [RFC format] Experiment with Unicode in HTML/PDF Martin J. Dürst
• [RFC format] Experiment with Unicode in HTML/PDF Larry Masinter
• RE: IETF 83 IRI Agenda and Presentations Larry Masinter

Thursday, 22 March 2012

• IRI WG transitions Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: IETF 83 IRI Agenda and Presentations Peter Saint-Andre

Wednesday, 21 March 2012

• Re: IETF 83 IRI Agenda and Presentations Martin J. Dürst

Tuesday, 20 March 2012

• IETF 83 IRI Agenda and Presentations Chris Weber

Wednesday, 14 March 2012

• RE: Transcription requirements Shawn Steele
• Re: [iri] #121: BIDI: Some users are requiring right-to-left label ordering. iri issue tracker
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-11.txt Martin J. Dürst
• Re: [iri] #25: Adapt rules for bidi components to those in IDNAbis iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #121: BIDI: Some users are requiring right-to-left label ordering. iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #118: What term to use for the kind of text that the Unicode Bidi Algorithm was designed for iri issue tracker

Tuesday, 13 March 2012

• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-11.txt Julian Reschke
• [iri] #121: BIDI: Some users are requiring right-to-left label ordering. iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #118: What term to use for the kind of text that the Unicode Bidi Algorithm was designed for iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #25: Adapt rules for bidi components to those in IDNAbis iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #118: What term to use for the kind of text that the Unicode Bidi Algorithm was designed for iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #117: conformance requirements in bidi document -- do they belong? iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #116: logical order and 'read' order iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #28: allow numbers at end of bidi components? iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #25: Adapt rules for bidi components to those in IDNAbis iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #117: conformance requirements in bidi document -- do they belong? iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #118: What term to use for the kind of text that the Unicode Bidi Algorithm was designed for iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #118: What term to use for the kind of text that the Unicode Bidi Algorithm was designed for iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #118: What term to use for the kind of text that the Unicode Bidi Algorithm was designed for iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #118: What term to use for the kind of text that the Unicode Bidi Algorithm was designed for iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #118: What term to use for the kind of text that the Unicode Bidi Algorithm was designed for iri issue tracker
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-11.txt Martin J. Dürst
• [iri] #120: Make reference [Duerst97] accessible again. iri issue tracker

Monday, 12 March 2012

• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-11.txt Julian Reschke
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-11.txt Martin J. Dürst
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-11.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• [iri] #119: Move some IANA-related text from 3987bis to 4395bis iri issue tracker
• RE: [iri] #118: What term to use for the kind of text that the Unicode Bidi Algorithm was designed for Phillips, Addison
• Re: [iri] #118: What term to use for the kind of text that the Unicode Bidi Algorithm was designed for Martin J. Dürst

Sunday, 11 March 2012

• Re: [iri] #118: What term to use for the kind of text that the Unicode Bidi Algorithm was designed for Matitiahu Allouche
• [iri] #118: What term to use for the kind of text that the Unicode Bidi Algorithm was designed for iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #117: conformance requirements in bidi document -- do they belong? iri issue tracker

Saturday, 10 March 2012

• [iri] #117: conformance requirements in bidi document -- do they belong? iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #116: logical order and 'read' order iri issue tracker
• [iri] #116: logical order and 'read' order iri issue tracker
• Finishing IRI work Larry Masinter

Friday, 9 March 2012

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-iri-bidi-guidelines-02.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Saturday, 3 March 2012

• [off-topic] Internet Draft formats (PDF,...) Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-iri-bidi-guidelines-01.txt Martin J. Dürst

Friday, 2 March 2012

• RE: Bidi Doc Shawn Steele
• IRI working group progress -- new drafts Larry Masinter
• RE: Bidi Doc Larry Masinter
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-iri-bidi-guidelines-01.txt Adil Allawi
• RE: FW: UTS #46, Unicode IDNA Compatibility Processing, Version 6.1 Released Larry Masinter
• RE: Bidi Doc Shawn Steele
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-iri-bidi-guidelines-01.txt Richard Ishida
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-iri-bidi-guidelines-01.txt Peter Saint-Andre
• RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-iri-bidi-guidelines-01.txt Phillips, Addison
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-iri-bidi-guidelines-01.txt Richard Ishida
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-10.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: [iri] #91: Mapping of <ireg-name>: preferred way? iri issue tracker
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-iri-bidi-guidelines-01.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: [iri] #27: do we need to say anything special about ZWNJ and ZWJ? iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #26: disallow combining characters at start of a component iri issue tracker
• RE: Bidi Doc Larry Masinter
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-iri-comparison-01.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• [iri] #115: update security considerations of comparison document iri issue tracker
• [iri] #114: priority of UTF-8 => %xx encoding in comparison ladder iri issue tracker
• [iri] #113: should IRI comparison discuss visual equivalence as a possible equivalence determination iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #112: Should IRI-comparison "update" 3986 with respect to comparison iri issue tracker
• [iri] #112: Should IRI-comparison "update" 3986 with respect to comparison iri issue tracker
• [iri] #111: should scheme definitions explicitly define equivalence iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #96: add definition of terms and introduction to comparison document iri issue tracker

Thursday, 1 March 2012

• [iri] #110: Format/wording changes for Additional Considerations (3.4.3) iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #91: Mapping of <ireg-name>: preferred way? iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #27: do we need to say anything special about ZWNJ and ZWJ? iri issue tracker
• Re: [iri] #26: disallow combining characters at start of a component iri issue tracker

Last message date: Friday, 30 March 2012 11:18:25 UTC