- From: iri issue tracker <trac+iri@trac.tools.ietf.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:38:13 -0000
- To: draft-ietf-iri-3987bis@tools.ietf.org, stpeter@stpeter.im
- Cc: public-iri@w3.org
#128: use of the term 'origin' #choose ticket.new #when True While reviewing 3987bis for i18n terminology, I came across this paragraph (Section 3.5): For compatibility with existing deployed HTTP infrastructure, the following special case applies for schemes "http" and "https" and IRIs whose origin has a document charset other than one which is UCS- based (e.g., UTF-8 or UTF-16). In such a case, the "query" component of an IRI is mapped into a URI by using the document charset rather than UTF-8 as the binary representation before pct-encoding. This mapping is not applied for any other scheme or component. The term 'origin' could be ambiguous here. It doesn't seem to be referencing the Web Origin Concept (RFC 6454) but instead seems to be based on the "document" (broadly construed) in which the http or https URL is found (e.g., as a hyperlink in an HTML document or perhaps as running text in an email message). It would be good to make that clear. #end #otherwise #if changes_body Changes (by ): #end #if changes_descr #if not changes_body and not change.comment and change.author Description changed by : #end -- #end #if change.comment Comment(by undefined): #end #end #end -- -----------------------+-------------------------------------- Reporter: stpeter@… | Owner: draft-ietf-iri-3987bis@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: 3987bis | Version: Severity: - | Keywords: -----------------------+-------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/128> iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>
Received on Monday, 11 June 2012 19:38:47 UTC