- From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 11:29:57 -0600
- To: public-iri@w3.org
- CC: masinter@adobe.com
On 3/1/12 5:58 PM, iri issue tracker wrote: > #111: should scheme definitions explicitly define equivalence > > from iri-comparison "todo" list: > > Should 4395bis reference iri-comparison and recommend scheme definitions > describe equivalence specifically? I never saw discussion of this issue. Where do we stand on this one? http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/111 Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2012 17:32:57 UTC