- From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:39:52 -0600
- To: public-iri@w3.org
- CC: duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
On 6/4/12 3:23 AM, iri issue tracker wrote: > #126: Fragments are part of URIs syntactically, but not part of URI scheme > definitions > > With respect to fragment identifiers, make sure that the following two > things are clear to people creating new schemes: > > 1) Fragment identifiers are part of URIs, and scheme definitions cannot > and MUST NOT disallow fragments on specific schemes (even if the usability > of a fragment id on the particular scheme being defined seems questionable > at the time the scheme definition is made). <hat type='individual'/> Martin, do you think that URNs violate the URI spec? Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
Received on Monday, 4 June 2012 17:44:48 UTC