public-iri@w3.org from June 2012 by date

Friday, 29 June 2012

IRI agenda items for IETF 84 Peter Saint-Andre
Re: why use IRIs? Peter Saint-Andre
Fwd: iri - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 84 Peter Saint-Andre

Monday, 25 June 2012

Re: why use IRIs? Martin J. Dürst

Thursday, 21 June 2012

Re: why use IRIs? Bjoern Hoehrmann
why use IRIs? Peter Saint-Andre

Monday, 18 June 2012

Re: [iri] #128: use of the term 'origin' Peter Saint-Andre

Saturday, 16 June 2012

Re: [iri] #128: use of the term 'origin' Larry Masinter

Monday, 11 June 2012

[iri] #129: IANA Considerations iri issue tracker
Re: [iri] #128: use of the term 'origin' iri issue tracker
[iri] #128: use of the term 'origin' iri issue tracker
Re: [iri] #69: Several issues in Introduction of 4395bis iri issue tracker

Friday, 8 June 2012

RE: 3987bis: IANA considerations Larry Masinter
RE: [iri] #69: Several issues in Introduction of 4395bis Larry Masinter
Re: rfc3987bis and RFC 6365 John C Klensin
Re: rfc3987bis and RFC 6365 Peter Saint-Andre
Re: rfc3987bis and RFC 6365 John C Klensin
Re: "plain text" vs. "running text" John C Klensin

Thursday, 7 June 2012

Re: "plain text" vs. "running text" Peter Saint-Andre
Re: "plain text" vs. "running text" Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: rfc3987bis and RFC 6365 Peter Saint-Andre
3987bis: IANA considerations Peter Saint-Andre
"plain text" vs. "running text" Peter Saint-Andre
3987bis: "origin" Peter Saint-Andre
rfc3987bis and RFC 6365 Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [iri] #127: mailing list review: optional or mandatory? Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [iri] #69: Several issues in Introduction of 4395bis Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [iri] #127: mailing list review: optional or mandatory? Martin J. Dürst
Re: [iri] #127: mailing list review: optional or mandatory? Ted Hardie
Re: [iri] #69: Several issues in Introduction of 4395bis Ted Hardie
Re: [iri] #127: mailing list review: optional or mandatory? iri issue tracker
[iri] #127: mailing list review: optional or mandatory? iri issue tracker
Re: 4395bis: inconsistent registration procedure Peter Saint-Andre

Wednesday, 6 June 2012

Re: [iri] #108: Add 'submitter' and 'owner' columns to 'URI/IRI Scheme Registration Template' iri issue tracker
Re: 4395bis: inconsistent registration procedure Martin J. Dürst
Re: [iri] #69: Several issues in Introduction of 4395bis Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [iri] #69: Several issues in Introduction of 4395bis Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: 4395bis: inconsistent registration procedure Bjoern Hoehrmann
4395bis: inconsistent registration procedure Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [iri] #64: Disallow registration of URI schemes with generic names 'uri', 'url', etc. Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [iri] #125: Clarify scope of scheme specifications to be <scheme-specific-part> only Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [iri] #69: Several issues in Introduction of 4395bis Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [iri] #126: Fragments are part of URIs syntactically, but not part of URI scheme definitions Peter Saint-Andre

Tuesday, 5 June 2012

Re: [iri] #119: Move some IANA-related text from 3987bis to 4395bis Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [iri] #111: should scheme definitions explicitly define equivalence Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [iri] #123: coordinate URI/IRI scheme prefix discussion with W3C HTML WG Peter Saint-Andre

Monday, 4 June 2012

Re: [iri] #126: Fragments are part of URIs syntactically, but not part of URI scheme definitions Peter Saint-Andre
meeting in Vancouver Peter Saint-Andre
[iri] #126: Fragments are part of URIs syntactically, but not part of URI scheme definitions iri issue tracker

Last message date: Friday, 29 June 2012 19:35:31 UTC