- From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 10:33:01 -0600
- To: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
- CC: "public-iri@w3.org" <public-iri@w3.org>
On 7/12/12 2:04 PM, Dave Thaler wrote: > In a previous meeting I believe we agreed that we should encourage > third-party > > registrations of URI schemes that the owners didn’t register. And > indeed we > > updated the language (e.g. around security considerations) to clarify > how to do so. > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URI_scheme lists 71 unregistered URI schemes in > > the “Unofficial but common URI schemes”. So it seems the right thing > to do is > > to try to follow the 4395bis process for all 71 of them. > > > > Not doing so would mean, IMO, we’d basically be leaving Wikipedia to be the > > unofficial registry that people will actually use (and check for > uniqueness when > > submitting registrations) instead of the IANA registry. > > > > I expect we’d want them all to be provisional (not permanent), and that > we don’t > > want a mailing list review of all 71 of them. > > > > Does this sound reasonable? Just want to check before submitting 71 IANA > requests for third-party registrations. It does sound reasonable. I hope you wrote a little script to automate all of that. :) Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
Received on Friday, 13 July 2012 16:33:32 UTC