- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:20:06 +0100
- To: Chris Weber <chris@lookout.net>
- CC: "PUBLIC-IRI@W3.ORG" <PUBLIC-IRI@w3.org>
On 2012-01-16 07:55, Chris Weber wrote:
> On 1/14/2012 5:16 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> I'm in the process of writing a Change Proposal asking for a removal
>> of this feature. In the meantime, it would be useful if the WG came up
>> with "official" feedback on overloading the scheme name.
>>
> <hat type="individual" />
>
> Is this the first example of a scheme prefix like "web+" overloading the
> scheme name? I'm not clear on the history, use cases, and the impetus
I think so, unless you count the "s" *post*fix (but that's more like a
convention).
That being said, similar problems were introduced by XHR for HTTP header
fields ("Sec-" prefix). See
<http://www.mnot.net/blog/2011/08/24/distributed_hungarian_notation_doesnt_work>.
> ...
Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 16 January 2012 08:27:47 UTC