Re: [iri] #75: Historical registrations and RFC 2119 lang

#75: Historical registrations and RFC 2119 lang


Comment (by masinter@…):

 What I'd like to do is a broader change, such that the IANA URI/IRI scheme
 registry had a column 'status', and that the Status could be Provisional,
 Permanent, Historical, rather than two registries (one Provisional, one
 Permanent)

 and that a request to change the Status was a matter of expert review, and
 could be initiated by anyone. This would allow a 'Historical' status by
 expert review, without moving things around.

 I'll work on wording changes to accomplish this.

-- 
-------------------------+------------------
 Reporter:  evnikita2@…  |       Owner:
     Type:  defect       |      Status:  new
 Priority:  minor        |   Milestone:
Component:  4395bis      |     Version:
 Severity:  -            |  Resolution:
 Keywords:               |
-------------------------+------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/75#comment:2>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>

Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 17:49:14 UTC