Re: [iri] #60: Should we recommend using different ABNF rule names to clarify escaping?

#60: Should we recommend using different ABNF rule names to clarify escaping?

Changes (by chris@…):

 * status:  new => closed
 * resolution:   => wontfix


Comment:

 There have been no objections and during the design team meeting today it
 was agreed to close this as won't fix.

-- 
----------------------+----------------------
 Reporter:  duerst@…  |       Owner:
     Type:  defect    |      Status:  closed
 Priority:  minor     |   Milestone:
Component:  4395bis   |     Version:
 Severity:  -         |  Resolution:  wontfix
 Keywords:            |
----------------------+----------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/60#comment:3>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>

Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 07:19:59 UTC