- From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:44:45 +0900
- To: "public-iri@w3.org" <public-iri@w3.org>
Dear IRI experts, Based on discussion at the (virtual) editorial meeting on Dec. 27/28, and in line with our current direction to move out "HTML Preprocessing" issues from RFC 3987bis to a separate spec at the W3C, I have replaced the sections Liberal Handling of Otherwise Invalid IRIs and Characters Disallowed or Not Recommended in IRIs with the section that we had before working on "HTML Preprocessing" issues, from draft-duerst-iri-bis-05.txt, entitled: Legacy Extended IRI Syntax Because we also have split the former section 3 into what's now section 3 and 4, I found it appropriate to submit a new version as -09. This is now available at http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-09.txt and should be available at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-09 in a few hours (the tools server is usually a bit behind the main server). You can look at the differences between -08 and -09 at http://tools.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url1=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-08.txt&url2=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-09.txt (you may have to piece that back together if some mail software (possibly on my end) chopped it up). What I did on LEIRIs was strictly only bringing back to old text. We still have to go through the diffs again and decide which of the text changes between draft-duerst-iri-bis-05 and draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-08 are due to the introduction of "HTML Preprocessing" into the draft, and which ones are independent of this. Also, we have to check the issues that were raised against the text in -08 and before and check how much of it still needs editing action. Regards, Martin.
Received on Monday, 9 January 2012 09:46:00 UTC