Monday, 30 January 2012
Wednesday, 25 January 2012
- Re: [iri] #76: Fix reference to RFC 5378
- Re: [iri] #71: Typo in ABNF production
- Re: [iri] #72: Another typo in ABNF production
- Re: [iri] #76: Fix reference to RFC 5378
- Re: [iri] #99: New schemes should make sure query part uses UTF-8
- Re: [iri] #75: Historical registrations and RFC 2119 lang
- Re: [iri] #108: Add 'submitter' and 'owner' columns to 'URI/IRI Scheme Registration Template'
Tuesday, 24 January 2012
Friday, 20 January 2012
Monday, 16 January 2012
Saturday, 14 January 2012
Friday, 13 January 2012
Thursday, 12 January 2012
- Re: [iri] #93: clarify which characters are disallowed vs. not recommended
- Re: [iri] #88: A number of ABNF issues in 3987bis
- Re: [iri] #93: clarify which characters are disallowed vs. not recommended
- Re: [iri] #103: u+FFFE and u+FFFF missing in section 6
- Re: [iri] #104: Characters are still excluded from URIs
Wednesday, 11 January 2012
- Re: [iri] #75: Historical registrations and RFC 2119 lang
- Re: [iri] #75: Historical registrations and RFC 2119 lang
- Re: [iri] #76: Fix reference to RFC 5378
- Re: [iri] #71: Typo in ABNF production
- Re: [iri] #72: Another typo in ABNF production
- Re: [iri] #82: Use of ":" in scheme specs
- Re: [iri] #77: Change controller in IESG-approved schemes specs
- Re: [iri] #64: Disallow registration of URI schemes with generic names 'uri', 'url', etc.
- Re: [iri] #84: No retroactivity
- Re: [iri] #74: Resolving ambiguous registrations
- Re: [iri] #60: Should we recommend using different ABNF rule names to clarify escaping?
- Re: [iri] #100: Reduce review period to two weeks?
- Re: [iri] #84: No retroactivity
- Re: [iri] #84: No retroactivity
- Re: [iri] #69: Several issues in Introduction of 4395bis
- Re: [iri] #69: Several issues in Introduction of 4395bis
Monday, 9 January 2012
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-09.txt
- Re: Moved back to section about LEIRIs
- Moved back to section about LEIRIs