- From: iri issue tracker <trac+iri@trac.tools.ietf.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:58:22 -0000
- To: draft-ietf-iri-3987bis@tools.ietf.org, masinter@adobe.com
- Cc: public-iri@w3.org, evnikita2@gmail.com
#93: clarify which characters are disallowed vs. not recommended
Changes (by masinter@…):
* status: closed => reopened
* resolution: fixed =>
Comment:
Addison wrote: "I don't have a problem with the name change. However, the
various paragraphs aren't always specific about whether the characters are
not allowed or just not recommended. The private use paragraph is a good
example of this."
Reopening with a broader scope. (I suppose I could open this as a new
issue but the history is relevant; this section originally was 'characters
Allowed in Legacy Extended IRIs but not in IRIs " back in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-iri-bis-06.
--
-------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: evnikita2@… | Owner: draft-ietf-iri-3987bis@…
Type: defect | Status: reopened
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: 3987bis | Version:
Severity: - | Resolution:
Keywords: |
-------------------------+---------------------------------------
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/93#comment:2>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>
Received on Friday, 21 October 2011 21:59:28 UTC