Monday, 31 October 2011
- Re: [iri] #104: Characters are still excluded from URIs
- Re: [iri] #104: Characters are still excluded from URIs
- Re: [iri] #101: Section 5.1 should only list "garbage"
- Re: [iri] #103: u+FFFE and u+FFFF missing in section 6
- Re: [iri] #102: ABNF notation needs improvement
- Re: [iri] #101: Section 5.1 should only list "garbage"
Sunday, 30 October 2011
- Re: [iri] #104: Characters are still excluded from URIs
- Re: [iri] #103: u+FFFE and u+FFFF missing in section 6
- Re: [iri] #102: ABNF notation needs improvement
Saturday, 29 October 2011
- tickets for Frank Ellermann comments
- [iri] #105: recycle at Proposed or do not allow characters previously allowed
- [iri] #104: Characters are still excluded from URIs
- [iri] #103: u+FFFE and u+FFFF missing in section 6
- [iri] #102: ABNF notation needs improvement
- [iri] #101: Section 5.1 should only list "garbage"
Friday, 28 October 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011
- Re: [iri] #100: Reduce review period to two weeks?
- [iri] #100: Reduce review period to two weeks?
- Re: [iri] #36: Some HTTP implementations send UTF8 path directly
Monday, 24 October 2011
- October 2011 feedback on PRI 185 (long!)
- Re: [iri] #47: Practical length limits on IRIs or components thereoff
- Re: [iri] #93: clarify which characters are disallowed vs. not recommended
- Re: [iri] #91: Mapping of <ireg-name>: preferred way?
Saturday, 22 October 2011
Friday, 21 October 2011
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-08.txt
- Re: [iri] #27: do we need to say anything special about ZWNJ and ZWJ?
- Re: [iri] #36: Some HTTP implementations send UTF8 path directly
- Re: [iri] #68: Make conversion from '\' to '/' scheme-dependent
- Re: [iri] #38: Handling of backslash ("\")
- [iri] #99: New schemes should make sure query part uses UTF-8
- Re: [iri] #40: Implementation advice on creating IRI query strings from HTML forms (was: Implementation advice on handling query strings)
- Re: [iri] #43: How to with illegal and disallowed IRI characters
- Re: [iri] #44: Reference Unicode TR 46, and if yes, how?
- Re: [iri] #45: Secure Comparison of URIs and IRIs in security token environments
- Re: [iri] #46: Normative length limits on IRIs or components theroff
- Re: [iri] #47: Practical length limits on IRIs or components thereoff
- Re: [iri] #66: Allow %-encoding to punycode conversion for ireg-name?
- Re: [iri] #93: clarify which characters are disallowed vs. not recommended (was: Private-use chars are allowed?)
- Re: [iri] #66: Allow %-encoding to punycode conversion for ireg-name?
- Re: [iri] #67: What to call the HTML5 equivalent of LEIRIs
- Re: [iri] #68: Make conversion from '\' to '/' scheme-dependent
- RE: [iri] #93: Private-use chars are allowed?
- Issues changed or updated on
- RE: [iri] #91: Mapping of <ireg-name>: preferred way?
- Re: Fwd: iri - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 82