- From: Michael A. Puls II <shadow2531@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 21:53:43 -0500
- To: public-iri@w3.org, "Michael A. Puls II" <shadow2531@gmail.com>
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 13:50:04 -0500, Michael A. Puls II <shadow2531@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 03:39:11 -0500, Martin J. Dürst > <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote: > >> I did not yet define the mailto scheme in terms of an IRI, but I may do >> that in a future version. > > If you did, does that mean that instead of using: > > URI: > <mailto:?subject=32%CE%BCF%20Choke> > > , one could use: > > IRI: > <mailto:?subject=32μF%20Choke> > > ? > Not that it matter for the example, but the "F" should be an "H" to make sense. -- Michael
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 02:54:57 UTC