- From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:36:30 +0900
- To: "Michael A. Puls II" <shadow2531@gmail.com>
- CC: public-iri@w3.org
Hello Michael, On 2011/03/10 3:50, Michael A. Puls II wrote: > On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 03:39:11 -0500, Martin J. Dürst > <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote: > >> I did not yet define the mailto scheme in terms of an IRI, but I may do >> that in a future version. > > If you did, does that mean that instead of using: > > URI: > <mailto:?subject=32%CE%BCF%20Choke> > > , one could use: > > IRI: > <mailto:?subject=32μF%20Choke> > > ? You can already use mailto:?subject=32μF%20Choke wherever you can use IRIs. Whether to define an URI/IRI scheme in terms of URIs or in terms of IRIs doesn't affect that. It's just a question of how the grammar is written. Regards, Martin. -- #-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 01:37:33 UTC