- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:11:35 -0400
- To: public-iri@w3.org
On 6/23/11 2:05 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > Consider the following HTML documents: And to be clear, I definitely think that the HTML spec should define behavior here, whatever that behavior is. But it's not clear how it can do this without conflicting with whatever the heck section 4.4 is talking about, because it's not clear what 4.4 is supposed to mean in various contexts. On its face, either a URI is just a string (in which case it doesn't matter where it came _from_ and what happens when you do things with it should just be covered by the spec that defines said things and has no place in the URI RFC) or a URI has some sort of additional metadata attached to it about being a same-document reference (or not) as 4.4 seems to imply. Which is it? -Boris
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2011 18:12:16 UTC