- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:06:39 -0400
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>, Chris Weber <chris@lookout.net>, public-iri@w3.org
On 6/23/11 1:02 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > Is your concern that not all kinds of normalization are allowed? No, not at all. My concern is that the entire section is not really something that belongs in a URI spec. See below. >> P.S. I also happen to think that the requirements of section 4.4 are >> insane, which is why there is no interop on it. > > There isn't? I think we need more examples. <img src="#foo"> doesn't follow section 4.4 in any browser I'm aware of, as one example. Nor should it, imo. I think the best course of action here is to remove 4.4 altogether and let specifications that actually have a concept of "document" define what should happen with URIs in various circumstances instead of trying to create blanket definitions and behavior prescriptions that don't actually work in many situations. -Boris
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2011 17:07:08 UTC