Re: making interoperability decisions (was Re: parsing URI (references) according to RFC 3986) from Boris Zbarsky on 2011-06-20 (public-iri@w3.org from June 2011)

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:28:07 -0400
To: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
CC: Chris Weber <chris@lookout.net>, Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "PUBLIC-IRI@W3.ORG" <PUBLIC-IRI@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4DFF6707.50507@mit.edu>

On 6/20/11 4:29 AM, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
> Is the HTML5 wording what we want, or do we need something else?

Unclear.  The section 7.2 wording as it stands (applying equally to all 
schemes) is definitely not something that web browsers can implement. 
The HTML5 wording is what at least Chrome implements; I suspect similar 
for Safari and IE.

-Boris

Received on Monday, 20 June 2011 15:28:52 UTC