- From: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 23:46:18 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, public-iri@w3.org
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > On 2011-06-20 06:44, Adam Barth wrote: >> >> ... >> Of course, folks who want to name such files will want to use the >> escaped form of \ in order for their site to work in browsers other >> than Firefox. >> ... > > That is the kind of thing we could document as guidance for content > producers. > >>> Note that the Chrome and Safari behavior is limited to some particular >>> URI >>> schemes or classes of URI schemes too. Testcase: >>> >>> data:text/html,<b>bold<\b>or not >>> >>> which shows the bold text "bold<\b>or not". I don't have IE9 on hand >>> right >>> this second to check its behavior. >> >> Correct. It's limited to "hierarchical" schemes, such as http, ftp, >> etc (at least in Chrome). > > How do you determine whether as scheme is "hierarchical"? There's a list. Adam
Received on Monday, 20 June 2011 06:47:17 UTC