- From: Chris Weber <chris@lookout.net>
- Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:35:22 -0700
- To: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
- CC: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "PUBLIC-IRI@W3.ORG" <PUBLIC-IRI@w3.org>
On 6/19/2011 5:10 PM, Adam Barth wrote: > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Chris Weber<chris@lookout.net> wrote: >> On 6/18/2011 6:09 AM, Adam Barth wrote: >> >> In a similar test case "http://example.com/foo\bar" both FF and Opera's path >> property in the DOM percent-encode the "\" as "/foo%5Cbar" and the >> corresponding HTTP request matches to become "GET /foo%5Cbar HTTP/1.1". IE, >> Chrome, and Safari all instead convert the "\" to a "/". Their DOM path >> property shows "/foo/bar" and the HTTP request matches as "GET /foo/bar >> HTTP/1.1". > > Indeed. The point is that IE, Chrome, and Safari treat \ as if it > were / in parsing URLs whereas Firefox does not. I suspect we'll want > the spec to say that \ should be treated like / when parsing URLs. > > Adam > 3987bis does say this in http://trac.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-05#section-7.2: 5. Convert backslashes ('\') matching href-path-sep to forward slashes ('/'). And HTML5 says the same in it's section on Resolving URLs http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/urls.html#resolving-urls 12. If result uses a scheme with a server-based naming authority, replace all U+005C REVERSE SOLIDUS (\) characters in result with U+002F SOLIDUS (/) characters. Regarding interoperability decisions - has consensus previously been made among the WG members as to how a behavior-difference should be resolved? In a case like treating a "\" as a "/", would the most reasonable decision be based on how many of the 5 most popular Web browsers are doing it, or would it be based on market share, or something else? For example, if only IE and Firefox treated "\" as "/", would that be reason to write such behavior into the spec? (considering those two together claim > 50% total market share). Or what if the case was Opera, Safari, and Chrome - 3 out of the 5 but still < 50% combined market share. Best regards, Chris
Received on Monday, 20 June 2011 04:35:55 UTC