- From: Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 23:05:03 -0700
- To: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Leif H Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- CC: "chris@lookout.net" <chris@lookout.net>, "public-iri@w3.org" <public-iri@w3.org>
> > > But I snipped that you said that %FC should be in wide use. And if > > that is the case, then there could be a lot of legacy content out > > there which Firefox is motivated to give a fake character display for, no? > > But how commonly are -or where- e.g. %FC used to point to a > > "ü-resource"? Not often, I think. Non-ascii is avoided, even today. > > It's definitely first and foremost ASCII only. After that, I don't have any statistics. > Maybe somebody from Google has some? > For static links to static resources, sure. But REST (for example) has been with us for a while. Non-ASCII is avoidable in a static resource world, which is no longer the most common kind of resource on the Web. Addison
Received on Thursday, 28 July 2011 06:05:28 UTC