- From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:38:00 +0900
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- CC: "public-iri@w3.org" <public-iri@w3.org>
Hello Leif, Can you explain what you mean by "semantic display"? Or much better, rewrite your explanations without using that term? Regards, Martin. On 2011/07/22 9:57, Leif Halvard Silli wrote: > Leif Halvard Silli, Thu, 21 Jul 2011 21:05:16 +0200: > >> For testing of page internal (that is #fragment links), you could >> create an ISO-8859-1 encoded page which contains links to directly >> typed fragments whose first letter begins with a non-ASCII letter from >> the ISO-8859-1 charset. And then you can test how that same page works >> if served/interpreted as another legacy, 8-bit encoding, such s KOI8-R >> etc. This test should compare wheter, for instance, in a ISO-8859-1 >> page, href="#Dürst" would hit both id="Dürst" and id="Dürst". > > Made some unpolished tests (with far to many links inside ...), based > on some old tests I had laying around: > http://malform.no/testing/html5/urls/ > > Results: > > # With regard to hover display and display on the URL bar, then those > tests show, for fragment URIs: > * that directly typed characters in a URL get semantic display > in all the browsers tested (Firefox, Opera, Chrome/Safari/iCab, IE8) > * that UTF-8 based percentage encoded URLs are given semantic display > # in Firefox, Safari/iCab and Opera > # but not in IE8 or Chrome. > * that not-UTF-8 based percent encoded URLs get semantic display > # in Firefox > # not in any other browser. Caveat Operea. See note. > > NOTE: For legacy encoded pages, then Opera makes a difference between > href="#D%FCrst" and href="D%FCrst": the fragment variant does not get > "semantic display" in Opera whereas the non-fragment URL does. > But there is a catch to what Opera (and Firefox too) do for > externally linking URLs: in the Windows-1251 encoded test page, the > '%FC' is turned into the cyrillic soft-sign letter. > > > # With regard to whether the URL works when activated, then those tests > show, for fragment URLs: > * that directly typed letters always works > * that UTF-8 based, percent encoded URLs > # never work, regardless of page encoding, for Opera and IE8 > # should work always, for Firefox and Safari/iCab/Chrome > regardless of character or page encoding. > * that not-UTF-8 based percent encoded URLs are interpreted > "semantically" > # for in IE8: never and not in any encoding > # for Firefox, Safari and iCab: with non-UTF-8 encodings only > # for Chrome and Opera: in any encoding, but seemingly only as long > as the character belongs to the Latin-1 character set.
Received on Monday, 25 July 2011 10:39:28 UTC