- From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:29:24 +0300
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: public-iri@w3.org, chris@lookout.net
06.07.2011 13:19, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 11:58:06 +0200, Mykyta Yevstifeyev > <evnikita2@gmail.com> wrote: >> (5a) There is no explanation of U+HHHH notation used in your >> document. Even though it's considered that the reader is familiar >> with it, clarifying won't be extra. (5b) Moreover, RFC 5137, BCP 137 >> did officially recommend to use \u'HHHH'. > > Not really: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5137#section-3 I agree - I looked at Section 4. It's correct here. Mykyta > >
Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2011 16:29:15 UTC