- From: iri issue tracker <trac+iri@trac.tools.ietf.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 01:15:23 -0000
- To: masinter@adobe.com
- Cc: public-iri@w3.org, evnikita2@gmail.com
#97: Provisional schemes de-asssignment
Changes (by masinter@…):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => invalid
Comment:
RFC 4395 has an explicit process for transitioning to "Historical", so the
statement "RFC 4395 says nothing about this" is confusing.
Frank's email to the uri-review list
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review/current/msg01530.html
says "IESG (the transition from a "provisional" to "historical" status is
not covered by BCP 35 section 5.3"
but this doesn't seem to be the case,
5.3. Change Control
Transition from 'permanent' to 'historical' status requires IESG
approval. Transition from 'provisional' to 'historical' may be
requested by anyone authorized to update the provisional
registration.
Please clarify and re-open if you can elaborate.
--
-------------------------+----------------------
Reporter: evnikita2@… | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: 4395bis | Version:
Severity: - | Resolution: invalid
Keywords: |
-------------------------+----------------------
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/97#comment:1>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2011 01:15:57 UTC