Wednesday, 28 December 2011
- Re: [iri] #88: A number of ABNF issues in 3987bis
- Re: [iri] #89: Pct-encoding of what? (what chars should be pct-encoded in IRIs)
- Re: [iri] #105: recycle at Proposed or do not allow characters previously allowed
- Re: [iri] #109: Invalid reference in section 4.2.3
- Re: [iri] #103: u+FFFE and u+FFFF missing in section 6
- Re: [iri] #104: Characters are still excluded from URIs
- Re: [iri] #92: Sections 3.4 & 3.5 should be moved into Section 3.6 of 3987bis
Wednesday, 21 December 2011
- [iri] #109: Invalid reference in section 4.2.3
- Re: [iri] #14: update URI to IRI to match IRI to URI
- Re: [iri] #13: fixes to IRI parsing algorithm for clarity (!?)
- Re: [iri] #5: Separate IRI from "presentation of IRI" as concepts
Wednesday, 14 December 2011
- Re: [iri] #107: Clarify requirement for security considerations
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-iri-4395bis-irireg-04.txt
- Re: [iri] #107: Clarify requirement for security considerations
- Re: [iri] #107: Clarify requirement for security considerations
- Re: [iri] #73: Decide on organization-specific schemes
- Re: [iri] #97: Provisional schemes de-asssignment
- [iri] #108: Add 'submitter' and 'owner' columns to 'URI/IRI Scheme Registration Template'
- Re: [iri] #79: Change controller for provisional registrations
- Re: [iri] #70: RFC 2119 language in Section 3.1 of 4395bis
- Re: [iri] #98: Registry format
- Re: [iri] #83: Create registration revision field in the template
Monday, 12 December 2011
Saturday, 10 December 2011
- [iri] Issue 83 "Create registration revision field in the template"
- Re: [iri] #107: Clarify requirement for security considerations
- Re: [iri] #73: Decide on organization-specific schemes
- RE: [iri] #73: Decide on organization-specific schemes
- Re: [iri] #73: Decide on organization-specific schemes
- Re: [iri] #73: Decide on organization-specific schemes
Friday, 9 December 2011
- Re: [iri] #107: Clarify requirement for security considerations
- Re: [iri] #73: Decide on organization-specific schemes