- From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 07:13:08 +0300
- To: public-iri@w3.org
23.08.2011 2:09, Chris Weber wrote: > <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/73> > > Is there any reason to pull the text in section 3.8 that relates to > organization-specific scheme names? It seems a harmless > recommendation to me, but maybe a sentence or two on the historical > significance would help readers understand why the recommendation was > made. If we're revising RFC 4395, we should note and remove any outdated or non-usable procedures/advices. I'd like these several sentences were deleted, and organizations that develop their schemes registered them according to the general rules. Mykyta > > --- > Chris Weber > IRI WG co-chair > >
Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2011 04:13:02 UTC