- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:40:57 +0200
- To: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
- CC: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, public-iri@w3.org
On 28.04.2011 08:29, Adam Barth wrote: > ... >> However, for the subset of possible references that do happen >> to match what are called valid URI references by RFC3986, then >> we have already tested consensus and deployed many implementations >> that conform exactly to the results given in RFC3986. If you >> find a difference between that and a single browser's behavior, >> then that browser has a bug and should be fixed. > > We've had implementors state on this list that they aren't going to do > that. In fact, they have stated that they're going to make their > implementations less conformant with RFC 3986 because the requirements > in RFC 3986 don't match the requirements they face the in real world. > > We can ignore what these implementors want, but that just means > they'll ignore us. > ... Please make sure that you also get the support from those implementers that *do* follow the spec. Reminder: not only UA implementers. That being said: it would be good to understand that the actual difference *is*. Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2011 06:41:30 UTC