- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 14:40:33 +0200
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- CC: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, IRI WG mailing list <public-iri@w3.org>
On 05.10.2010 06:17, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > ... > My draft does not include the registration template. That has a lead to > some complaints, but my reading of RFC 4395 is that it is not required, > and http://www.w3.org/mid/455CCAAD.2040407@att.com Tony Hansen confirmed > that. The template is not currently used outside the specification when > it is part of an RFC, and in my case it would just be a TOC for the do- > cument; I think it should be clarified that it is not needed in this > case. > ... Disagreeing :-) A registration template is very useful, because: - it forces the author to think about all the required fields, and - it makes it easy for reviewers to actually find the relevant sections in the spec. Thus I'd like the template to become mandatory. Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 5 October 2010 13:41:16 UTC