- From: Slim Amamou <slim@alixsys.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 08:07:30 +0100
- To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
- Cc: Mark Davis ☕ <mark@macchiato.com>, "Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin" <aharon@google.com>, Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com>, Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, "public-iri@w3.org" <public-iri@w3.org>, "bidi@unicode.org" <bidi@unicode.org>, Murray Sargent <murrays@exchange.microsoft.com>
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com> wrote: (...) > The LRO bearing versions display the same in both RTL and LTR contexts, > although the path element order appears backwards to RTL readers. The > unadorned text versions display "normally" (to an RTL reader) only when they > are predominantly right-to-left with isolated LTR runs. They look broken (I > suspect even to RTL readers) Yes. More on this in this thread : http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2010Jan/0025.html -- Slim Amamou | سليم عمامو http://alixsys.com
Received on Wednesday, 26 May 2010 07:09:04 UTC