Re: Special ordering for BIDI URLs

To which I responded :

http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/2010-February/006530.html

Then you said :

http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/2010-February/006531.html

Then I said :

http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/2010-February/006532.html


On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Abdulrahman I. ALGhadir <
aghadir@citc.gov.sa> wrote:

>  Well check this out
>
>
>
> http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/2010-February/006529.html
>
>
>
> cause your proof was disproved back then.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* public-iri-request@w3.org [mailto:public-iri-request@w3.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Slim Amamou
> *Sent:* 25/May/2010 1:30 PM
> *To:* Martin J. Dürst
>
> *Cc:* Mark Davis ☕; public-iri@w3.org; bidi@unicode.org; Shawn Steele;
> Murray Sargent; aharon@google.com
> *Subject:* Re: Special ordering for BIDI URLs
>
>
>
>
>
> 2010/5/25 "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
>
> (...)
>
>
>
> This is maybe the case already now, but it should not be our
> aim. In a sense, this even breaks the principle of net neutrality.
>
>
>
> In what sense exactly would this break net neutrality?
>
>
>
> In the sense of a URI transmitted over the internet could not look the same
> on both ends in some situations.
>
>
>
>
>
>  For the record I proposed enforcing LTR directionality for URIs as a
> solution, and already proved that at least for the HOST part (IDN), and
> given the current specs, labels MUST be ordered LTR.
>
>
>
> Could you give a pointer to that 'proof'?
>
>
>
> http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/2010-February/006528.html
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Slim Amamou | سليم عمامو
> http://alixsys.com
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Disclaimer:
> This message and its attachment, if any, are confidential and may contain legally
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
> sender immediately and delete this message and its attachment, if any, from your
> system. You should not copy this message or disclose its contents to any other
> person or use it for any purpose. Statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail
> are those of the sender, and do not necessarily reflect those of the Communications
> and Information Technology Commission (CITC). CITC accepts no liability for damage
> caused by this email.
>
>


-- 
Slim Amamou | سليم عمامو
http://alixsys.com