- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:42:27 +0200
- To: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Cc: public-iri@w3.org
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:10:18 +0200, Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote: > Any better idea for a name? I find "needs to be used" a bit too strong, > but I guess it's the users' choice, not ours. HTML5 re-used the term URL. That worked for me. I'm not sure why "needs to be used" is a bit too strong. Browsers handle URLs the same everywhere. (Admittedly outside HTML context the encoding is often just set to UTF-8 by default, but that is not the only part of the algorithm that matters.) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2009 07:43:18 UTC