- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:59:50 +0200
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- CC: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, "Michael A. Puls II" <shadow@shadow2531.com>, "jwz@jwz.org" <jwz@jwz.org>, "PUBLIC-IRI@W3.ORG" <PUBLIC-IRI@w3.org>
Larry Masinter wrote: > What about encouraging URI/IRI scheme registrations to > say about whether fragment identifiers are necessary, > important, useful, allowed. > > mailto: could then disallow # fragment identifiers. > ... Not sure. Consider a scheme that was designed not to be resolvable, and thus its specs says that fragment identifiers do not make sense. If it *becomes* resolvable later on, they would. I think fragment identifiers always make sense if you can use the scheme to obtain a representation of the resource. That's all that should be said. BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 14 October 2009 18:02:07 UTC