- From: Erik van der Poel <erikv@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:30:59 -0700
- To: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Cc: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "PUBLIC-IRI@W3.ORG" <PUBLIC-IRI@w3.org>
> Okay. When it sends out a request to a proxy, it uses a full URI, so there > it is an URI producer. When there's no proxy, only the path and query part > are sent, so I'm not sure we can consider that an URI producer. But maybe > the best way to see this is indeed to look at it as a relative URI. In order to ensure interoperability, it is important to consider both the input and the output, whether that output is a URI, DNS packet, HTTP Host: header, HTTP GET request or even displayed IRI (for humans). We may not be able to address all of these in the public-iri mailing list, but I do think that all of these are important. Erik
Received on Monday, 12 October 2009 17:31:33 UTC