- From: (unknown charset) Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 13:46:37 -0400
- To: (unknown charset) (unknown charset) Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Cc: (unknown charset) www-tag@w3.org, public-iri@w3.org, Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, Lisa Dusseault <lisa.dusseault@messagingarchitects.com>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> Once it became apparent, however, that the progress of [IRI-BIS] to
> Draft Standard status was likely to be considerably delayed for
> reasons outside its editors' control
Two questions have arisen wrt this:
1) Why "Draft Standard"?
My mistake -- I misunderstood the IETF nomenclature -- all we need
is for [IRI-BIS] to be published as an RFC with an RFC number.
2) What "reasons outside its editors' control"?
I don't trust my memory of the relevant rumours sufficiently to
commit it to print: Martin, would you care to hazard a guess as to
when [IRI-BIS] might be published as an RFC, and/or tell us what
the hold-up was or is?
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFJ/x05kjnJixAXWBoRAqONAJ9ZgBE+0gekeIITtx4HFgeLz4QdcACbBci8
C4ky5KpXgSTsQVgzVNhPwJ4=
=lQAe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 4 May 2009 17:47:06 UTC