Thanks, all, for the info about LEIRI, XML, etc. > I don't understand this: the IRI document currently > describes a HREF -> URI mapping; is that OK > with you? There are also issues with the URI -> DNS/HTTP mapping, but I suppose that discussion belongs in uri@w3.org. There are many small issues with IDNA and IRI, but I suppose one of the bigger issues is the question of mapping. HTML implementers will be trying to decide what to do about IDNA2003/2008 co-existence and/or migration. We currently have two drafts that are quite different: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idnabis-mappings-01 http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr46/tr46-1.html ErikReceived on Thursday, 30 July 2009 20:22:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:14:35 UTC