> I think the continued repetition of "HTML5" here > is confusing. HTML5 was the first to define the > algorithm, but it is used by Web browsers for HTTP, > CSS, HTML, XMLHttpRequest, etc. and for all these > there is content out there that depends on it. "HTML5" refers to the HTML 5 spec, not the Hypertext Markup Language that is among the things the spec attempts to define. > Also, it makes much more sense (due to the URL > character encoding) to map Hypertext References > directly to URIs rather than frame them as some > type of IRI. I don't understand this: the IRI document currently describes a HREF -> URI mapping; is that OK with you? -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Thursday, 30 July 2009 13:01:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:14:35 UTC