Re: More percent encoding normalization v. IRI -> URI -> IRI mapping differences

Hello Geoffrey,

Many thanks for your comment. I think this is a good catch, and I'll try 
to come up with some wording when I get around to work on the document.

Regards,   Martin.

On 2009/12/02 18:21, Geoffrey Sneddon wrote:
> Beyond my previous email about the contradiction in conformance
> requirements (i.e., circumventing the MUST in 5.3.2.3 by mapping the IRI
> to a URI and back to an IRI), the IRI -> URI -> IRI mapping decodes all
> percent-encoded iunreserved and iprivate (where allowed) characters (at
> least if I'm understanding what it is doing correctly), whereas the
> percent-encoding normalization only decodes unreserved characters.
>
> As far as I can tell, changing the percent-encoding normalization to
> decode all iunreserved characters and iprivate where allowed would
> resolve this difference.
>

-- 
#-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp   mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp

Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2009 11:08:20 UTC