- From: Daniel R. Tobias <dan@tobias.name>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:46:03 -0400
- To: uri-review@ietf.org, hybi@ietf.org, uri@w3.org
On 7 Aug 2009 at 9:16, David Booth wrote: > Note that I am talking about the *scheme*, not the protocol. In > essence, a URI prefix such as "http://wss.example/" can be defined that > would serve the same purpose as a "wss:" scheme: an agent that > recognizes this prefix will know to attempt the WSS protocol. It seems like a bad idea to me, to have to build special exceptions to how a user agent processes URIs, where the protocol specified in the URI isn't actually the one that is used, based on "magic strings" within other parts than the scheme. -- == Dan == Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/ Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/ Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/
Received on Monday, 10 August 2009 13:46:25 UTC