- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 10:21:54 +0900
- To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>, "Addison Phillips" <addison@yahoo-inc.com>
- Cc: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, <public-iri@w3.org>
Hello Paul, Many thanks for your careful reading. I have added this as issue leiri-relative-116 at http://www.w3.org/International/iri-edit#leiri-relative-116 I'm not able to post a new draft at this moment because of the IETF publication moratorium before the IETF meeting, but I'll get back to it as soon as possible. Regards, Martin. At 02:31 08/03/05, Grosso, Paul wrote: > >I was just rereading the LEIRI section of >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-duerst-iri-bis-02.txt >where it says: > > The syntax of Legacy Extended IRIs is the same as that > for IRIs, except that ucschar is redefined.... > >In section "2.2. ABNF for IRI References and IRIs", it >has a production for IRI (that has a required scheme) >and another for IRI-reference. > >One could read section 7 to say that a LEIRI must match >the production for IRI which would mean there could be >no such thing as a relative LEIRI. I'm quite sure we >don't want this. > >I think section 7 needs to say: > > The syntax of Legacy Extended IRIs is the same as that > for IRI-reference, except that ucschar is redefined.... > >since the production for IRI-reference is: > > IRI-reference = IRI / irelative-ref > >making IRI-reference the most inclusive one. > >paul #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2008 01:25:41 UTC