- From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:48:07 -0400
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Cc: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>, Addison Phillips <addison@yahoo-inc.com>, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org, public-iri@w3.org
Martin Duerst scripsit: > It may be that indeed all or most of your specs want to reference > LEIRIs. In that case (especially if it's all), it might be approriate > to rewrite section 7 of the current draft to concentrate on LEIRI > references (maybe as far as changing the title to Legacy Extended IRI > References). In particular if it's all your specs, the rewrite should > be straightforward. Please advise. Reading "LEIRI references" for "LEIRIs" in the first sentence, then yes, I believe we care only about LEIRI references and not at all about LEIRIs. -- John Cowan http://ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org All "isms" should be "wasms". --Abbie
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2008 01:48:47 UTC