- From: Michel Suignard <michelsu@windows.microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 10:32:55 -0700
- To: "Martin Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-iri@w3.org>
> From: Martin Duerst [mailto:duerst@w3.org] > > I have listed this as issue ISO-Uni-ref-34. > > I think this should be 4.0.1, yes? Absolutely, my bad. > Well yes. But for the record, my personal expectation > would be that the IRI spec follows updates of these other > specs in the future. In most cases, the changes only deal > with edge cases anyway. Of course, we have to make sure > that we take this decision explicitly in each case, so > that we can assess the impact. We are in agreement here. >> The HTML version of the IRI draft should also show >> explicitly the link values, which it doesn't as of now. > > If you know what option to set in xml2rfc, I'll do it. > Otherwise, I don't want to spend the time, because the > HTML version is just a sideline. What counts for the > IETF is the text/plain version. > > >> Unicode 4.01 still use the same repertoire as 10646:2003, >> so we are good on that part. > > I have marked this issue as tentatively closed. > Can you please do another cross-check? This is fine by me, assuming of course you update the references. Michel
Received on Thursday, 20 May 2004 13:33:01 UTC