W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-iri@w3.org > May 2004

Re: draft-duerst-iri-07.txt: 2 week mailing list last call

From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 14:02:54 +0100
Message-Id: <>
To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, public-iri@w3.org

At 18:05 12/05/04 +0900, Martin Duerst wrote:
>Hello Graham,
>I have marked this as issue 5.2resolve-32.
>At 12:02 04/05/10 +0100, Graham Klyne wrote:
>>Section 5.2:
>>The MUST in the second paragraph seems to be straying inappropriately 
>>into application design territory.
>Sorry, but I don't think so. If different applications resolve
>in different ways, that would be a very bad idea.

I agree that would not be good.  I think the "MUST" in the first paragraph 
addresses this.  I was referring to the "MUST" in the second paragraph:
For comparison, such conversions MUST only
be done on the fly, while retaining the original IRI.


Graham Klyne
For email:
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2004 09:25:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:14:31 UTC