- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 15:41:02 -0400
- To: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>, public-iri@w3.org
Hello Paul, Sorry for the delay, I was traveling. At 16:04 03/04/17 -0700, Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote: >At 5:35 PM -0400 4/17/03, Martin Duerst wrote: >>Can you please check whether you are okay with the new section at >>http://www.w3.org/International/iri-edit/draft-duerst-iri.html#UTF8use, >>or whether you think that it needs some stronger normative wording? > >Yep, that's much better. > >One suggestion, though: the last sentence of the third paragraph of that >section ends "...the escaped octets cannot be converted to actual >characters in an IRI, because the escaping is based on iso-8859-1 rather >than UTF-8." That is true, but it brings in an encoding issue that isn't >necessary. I propose "...the escaped octets cannot be converted to actual >characters in an IRI, because the escaping is not encoded as UTF-8." I have removed the reference to iso-8859-1, although I have left the text as "escaping is not based on UTF-8" rather than "escaping is not encoded as UTF-8". I hope this is okay with you, and I'm closing the issue. Please tell me if you don't like it, and want the issue kept open. Regards, Martin.
Received on Friday, 2 May 2003 15:46:08 UTC