- From: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:14:03 -0700
- To: public-iri@w3.org
Whether it is in this document or another, I believe it should be in a normative part of the specification. I'm concerned that moving the question of equivalence to an appendix may not have the force needed to flag that this is one of the critical requirements for interoperability. regards, Ted On Thursday, April 17, 2003, at 10:06 AM, Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote: > > At 9:33 AM -0700 4/17/03, Larry Masinter wrote: >> I think it sounds like the IRI document might need an >> expanded section or even separate document covering >> IRI equivalence, including the additional considerations >> of escape sequences, different normalization, different >> case transitions based on language, etc. > > Agree, but not about a separate document. It should be in this > document, but can be an appendix. > > --Paul Hoffman, Director > --Internet Mail Consortium > >
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2003 14:22:17 UTC