W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-iri@w3.org > April 2003

Re: Some issues with the IRI document [nfcnfkc-04]

From: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:14:03 -0700
To: public-iri@w3.org
Message-Id: <5EC4C0DA-7100-11D7-822E-000393CB0816@qualcomm.com>

Whether it is in this document or another, I believe it should be
in a normative part of the specification.  I'm concerned that
moving the question of equivalence to an appendix may not
have the force needed to flag that this is one of the critical
requirements for interoperability.

On Thursday, April 17, 2003, at 10:06 AM, Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote:

> At 9:33 AM -0700 4/17/03, Larry Masinter wrote:
>> I think it sounds like the IRI document might need an
>> expanded section or even separate document covering
>> IRI equivalence, including the additional considerations
>> of escape sequences, different normalization, different
>> case transitions based on language, etc.
> Agree, but not about a separate document. It should be in this 
> document, but can be an appendix.
> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --Internet Mail Consortium
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2003 14:22:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:14:29 UTC