- From: Tobie Langel <tobie@unlockopen.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 19:23:53 +0000
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>, public-invited-experts@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAKgxSaANDkQUfd1+t9s5OSkiiR6EYhvjatutgppHfTg6Exi3aQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 7:58 PM fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 1/10/19 6:16 AM, Tobie Langel wrote: > > > > B) Designated observer at W3C Advisory Committee Meetings > > ========================================================= > > > > W3C Invited Experts may designate one individual amongst themselves > (volunteer? elect?) to > > attend as an observer the W3C Advisory Committee Meetings [1] which > take place twice a year. > > That non-voting individual represents the interests of W3C Invited > Experts and is allowed to > > summarize and bring back information that is not member-confidential. > > > > To that effect, a straw-man proposal is for the designated Invited > Expert self-declares to > > <ie-contact@w3.org <mailto:ie-contact@w3.org>> who subscribes them > to w3c-ac-forum [2], the list > > for discussion among W3C Advisory Committee Members and the Advisory > Board on matters of > > relevance to W3C. > > > > Will W3C cover the travelling expenses of this IE observer and wave AC > meeting fees if there are > > any? Or this another case of expecting IE to self-fund? > > Quite frankly, if W3C has any funding to cover IE travelling > expenses, I'd rather they used it for technical groups, not > for this. > Yeah, I don't disagree. Attending the AC has very little value—which is why I was so surprised Fronteers felt like it was worth a time and pecuniary investment. --tobie
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2019 20:40:44 UTC