- From: hellekin <how@zoethical.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 15:26:16 +0100
- To: public-interop-remedies@w3.org
On 12/9/21 3:07 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > My focus is on avoiding distractions and making our work efficient. With that in mind, let's try this. > > If one or more people can provide an alternative that is: > - free to use and not proprietary (for some definition) > - does not require lots of configuration / fiddling > - multi-platform (minimum of OSX, Windows and Linux) > - is reasonably performant for 15+ participants > Agreed. Note that "free to use" is not "free software" nor "open technologies". Someone still has to pay for it. > - provides video and audio for all participants > Why is video necessary? Especially if you expect people joining by telephone, I don't see why this is a valid criterion. > > we'll use that. However, we'll leave the Zoom reservation intact, so that if we have problems we can fall back to that. > Some of us then won't be able to participate, and it appears that it is not for purity reasons (ask Audre Lorde) but for technical and ethical reasons. I would not be surprised that these very people share ethical concerns that would then not be heard in the group, which would considerably impair the group's credibility. > Any volunteers? > As I mentioned before I can provide a Mumble instance, if the BBB instance that may be provided graciously by the Social CG would not be available by the time of the meeting. I'm ready to boost the hardware configuration to ensure it scales up to an adequate number of participants. Regards, == hk
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2021 14:26:32 UTC