- From: Yuriy Dybskiy <yuriy@dybskiy.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2019 18:36:45 -0800
- To: AKASH KHOSLA <akhosla@berkeley.edu>
- Cc: hyperledger-quilt@lists.hyperledger.org, ledger@ietf.org, public-interledger@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CALqF4L6V8o0zZqyhpsHdyqA3DWS7kKYVNoyp1wUjagS_EazSqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Akash, really great proposal! I've been using Discord more and more lately so I'm definitely +1 on that one. Rocket.chat is built with Meteor and I used to be a huge fan of it so I'm +1 on that option as well :) Discord might be the easiest to setup and more polished so slight preference there, but long term maybe Rocket.chat is a better option. Curious what others think. On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 7:02 PM AKASH KHOSLA <akhosla@berkeley.edu> wrote: > Hi all, > > I was wondering if there would be any interest in moving from Gitter to > another platform. The main reason I bring this up is because Gitter could > be out of the way for a lot of us and the application doesn't encourage > dedicated usage. Email lists are a bit old school and signing up for the > Interledger one is out of the way. I think the reason for such a cryptic > interface for the w3c style/linux foundation emails list is sybil > resistance and anti-spam since there are liberal write permissions to the > lists. I think scaling the community requires something better than email > and Gitter. Would be great to hear thoughts on this. > > Couple problems with Gitter: > > 1. Clunky interface > 2. Poor separation of conversations/rooms > 3. Bad search function > 4. Bad mobile app > > > Some alternatives I think users enjoy using, and are well known in dev > communities: > > *Rocket.chat <https://rocket.chat/>* > Pros: > > 1. Open source chat (basically a friendly IRC replacement) > 2. Self hosting is free, cloud options available, easy to deploy with > scripts > 3. Slack-like interface > 4. Good search functionality > 5. Threads > <https://github.com/RocketChat/Rocket.Chat/pull/11803#issuecomment-455963816> > are being implemented > 6. Usable mobile applications > 7. Actively maintained + marketplace integrations > 8. Can deploy at chat.interledger.org (would be happy to help). > 9. Easy sign in with GitHub, just like gitter. > > Cons: > > 1. Not as well known as discord, slack or gitter from what I can tell, > but I expect it to continue to grow in usage down the line and gain even > more support than it already has. > > > *Discord* > Pros: > > 1. Commonly used > 2. Free to use unlike sack > 3. Fast and friendly > 4. Solid mobile apps > 5. Actively maintained > 6. No self hosting or maintenance > 7. Supports integrations > > Cons: > > 1. May not be free forever > 2. Chat logs are owned by Discord > 3. More complex interface than Slack/Rocket (some colleagues and I > describe it as heavier > > > This list may not be complete in terms of pros and cons so please chime in > if you have a personal preference or have something to say about these > platforms or others. I've spent some time with both alternatives, you can > generally find demos on their corresponding websites to see what you like > best. > > *Akash Khosla* > Fourth Year EECS > akhosla@berkeley.edu > -- Best regards, Yuriy @html5cat <http://twitter.com/html5cat> Dybskiy e-mail: yuriy@dybskiy.com phone: +1 (650) 434-2004 Dybskiy.com <http://dybskiy.com> / Twitter <http://twitter.com/html5cat> / GitHub <http://github.com/html5cat> / Linkedin <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/dybskiy>
Received on Monday, 4 February 2019 02:38:44 UTC