Re: ASN.1 OER encoding for InterledgerPaymentPacket

Thanks Evan!  I'll adjust my implementation to reflect your thoughts
(aligning with open question #2), unless I hear otherwise.

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 2:48 PM Evan Schwartz <evan@ripple.com> wrote:

> Stefan will have to correct me if I'm wrong but my understanding is as
> follows:
>
> The InterledgerProtocolPayment is the "data" portion of the
> InterledgerPacket and it is encoded as a length-prefixed octet string. In
> the JS implementation the "InterledgerPacket" is referred to as the
> "envelope" (see here
> <https://github.com/interledgerjs/ilp-packet/blob/master/index.ts#L17-L30> --
> the naming should be made more consistent). The envelope/generic packet
> effectively puts a type and length prefix in front of whatever message
> comes afterwards.
>
> I think the answer to your open question is #2
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 5:31 PM David Fuelling <dfuelling@sappenin.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey All,
>>
>> Would anyone be able to assist in helping me understand how to properly
>> encode an InterledgerProtocolPayment
>> <https://github.com/interledger/rfcs/blob/master/asn1/InterledgerProtocol.asn> using
>> ASN.1 OER encoding?
>>
>> I've published a gist that I think is "mostly there", but am unclear how
>> this packet interacts with its parent definition found in
>> InterledgerPacket
>> <https://github.com/interledger/rfcs/blob/master/asn1/GenericPacket.asn>.
>>
>> Here's the gist:
>> https://gist.github.com/sappenin/100a475fc7175a164a949985b05fa696
>>
>> My two questions are:
>>
>>    1. Is InterledgerProtocolPayment simply the "data" portion of an
>>    InterledgerPacket (i.e., InterledgerProtocolPayment is encoded inside of an
>>    InterledgerPacket)?  If so, is this "data" encoded as a length-prefixed
>>    octet string?  Or as a Sequence?  Or, is there really just a single
>>    "thing" called InterledgerProtocolPayment, and InterledgerPacket is just a
>>    typing mechanism?  See the end of my gist in the "questions" section for
>>    some concrete examples of this (though perhaps neither is correct).
>>
>>    2. Does the encoding put forward in my gist seem correct otherwise?
>>
>> Thanks for any assistance!
>> David
>>
> --
>
> Evan Schwartz
> Software Engineer
> Managing Director of Ripple Luxembourg
>

Received on Monday, 1 May 2017 15:34:13 UTC