W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-interledger@w3.org > July 2017

Re: [Ledger] Forming a Routing Working Group

From: Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar) <naikumar@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 11:59:58 +0000
To: Geoffrey Goodell <goodell@oxonia.net>, Jehan Tremback <jehan.tremback@gmail.com>
CC: Evan Schwartz <evan@ripple.com>, Tony Arcieri <tony@chain.com>, Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>, "Interledger Mailing List - IETF" <ledger@ietf.org>, Ryan Fugger <arv@ryanfugger.com>
Message-ID: <1C8F2281-3CA7-4B28-ADD3-64D8EADD43F0@cisco.com>
Hi,

Please share if there is any usecase/requirement document. I am interested in learning more on this space.

Thanks,
Nagendra

On 7/7/17, 1:40 PM, "Geoffrey Goodell" <goodell@oxonia.net> wrote:

    Curious why you are not just doing onion routing if you need anonymity or DHT
    if you don't.  In particular I would surmise that a protocol that floods the
    network will not scale.  Is there reason to assume an underlying structure in
    the network such that some nodes cannot reach each other directly, and if so,
    then why?  Have the requirements been documented?
    
    Geoff
    
    On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 11:51:54AM -0700, Jehan Tremback wrote:
    > I missed the call as well. I once designed a reactive payment routing
    > protocol based on AODV. It floods the network, and reveals the existence,
    > but not the source or destination of payments. It does not require any
    > central or on-chain registries of open channels, so it can be used across
    > different underlying payment techniques. Some of you have seen it already,
    > should I post it here again? I'd also be interested in learning of new
    > developments in the space.
    > 
    > -Jehan
    > 
    > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Evan Schwartz <evan@ripple.com> wrote:
    > 
    > > Sounds good. I would propose that this type of group should start and work
    > > on a shared set of docs that describes options, ongoing research, etc so
    > > that others can participate and follow along.
    > >
    > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 9:10 PM Tony Arcieri <tony@chain.com> wrote:
    > >
    > >> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Ryan Fugger <arv@ryanfugger.com> wrote:
    > >>
    > >>> This is a great idea Evan.  I am very interested in routing.  I don't
    > >>> manage calls well, but I would appreciate being able to observe and
    > >>> hopefully participate a bit over email.  Please let us know if/when any new
    > >>> mailing list gets set up for this.  Thanks!
    > >>>
    > >>
    > >> I'm in a similar boat to Ryan: a big fan of things like BGP and layer 3
    > >> routing as well as proprietary payment network routing, but would prefer to
    > >> participate in something like this a bit more asynchronously as opposed to
    > >> a call.
    > >>
    > > --
    > >
    > > Evan Schwartz
    > > Software Engineer
    > > Managing Director of Ripple Luxembourg
    > >
    
    > _______________________________________________
    > Ledger mailing list
    > Ledger@ietf.org
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ledger

    
    
    
    

Received on Monday, 10 July 2017 12:02:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 10 July 2017 12:02:33 UTC