W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-interledger@w3.org > April 2017

Re: Organizing...

From: Andrew Bransford Brown <andrewbb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:46:57 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPS+YFJ-VCfqp00wAVBXjpq6CnzvjZd7GbECTPvhYKrvDhkq-w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org>
Cc: Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>
Michiel, that's a great idea, but I'm not sure the "smart contract"
protocol is ready for it.

Would it be possible to form a group focusing on contract structure, as
others have suggested?

I'm not sure how to do that.


On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:08 AM, Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org>
wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thanks for raising the question of making for-profit ledgers (like, one
> day, your Promise app?) ILP compatible.
>
> On Apr 18, 2017 8:45 PM, "Andrew Bransford Brown" <andrewbb@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Good job on the ILP call.
>
>
> There is nothing precluding each member of this group from profiting or
> creating for-profit entities based on these protocols.
>
>
> Correct! Your Promise app could also be ILP-based for the payment part of
> contract execution. Even if you don't publish its source code, you can make
> it compatible with other people's apps.
>
> That means, you use your Promise app, other members use their own software
> on their own server, yet payments succeed end-to-end. That's the
> Interledger vision.
>
> There is a public network of ILP-enabled servers, see
> https://connector.land.
>
> Would you be interested in joining the public Interledger network with
> your Promise app?
>
>
> The purpose is to convene upon open standards.  Through a standard
> language, all can benefit.
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 19 April 2017 18:47:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 19 April 2017 18:47:31 UTC